Integrating Course Material and Application: A Progressive Writing Assignment Applied to an Astrochemistry Tutorial

Olivia H Wilkins, Camillus F Buzard

Abstract


A major challenge in teaching is helping students integrate course concepts to understand the big picture of a field and apply those concepts in new situations. To address this challenge in a tutorial course about astrochemistry (taught by graduate students to chemistry undergraduates), we implemented a progressive writing assignment that culminated in a final presentation. In the progressive writing assignment, students chose an astrochemistry topic they found interesting to be the subject of three sequential papers, which became the basis for their presentations. The purpose of this assignment was to gradually introduce chemistry students to research areas in astronomy, which is by nature outside the general chemistry curriculum, while also providing students with regular feedback. Over the course of the assignment, students applied key themes in the course—significance of astrochemistry research, research methods, and chemistry in astronomical environments—separately to their chosen topics before explaining in the final presentation how these different aspects of astrochemistry work together. By incorporating stories and anaologies, rather than just facts, students gave presentations that were accessible to a novice audience. As a result, students explained broader impacts of astrochemistry research, rather than just focusing on results, and they entertained questions with answers that went beyond clarification of the material discussed.

Full Text:

HTML PDF

References


Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M. C., & Norman, M. K. (2010). How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Ekholm, E., Zumbrunn, S., & Conklin, S. (2015). The relation of college student self-efficacy toward writing and writing self-regulation aptitude: Writing feedback perceptions as a mediating variable. Teaching in Higher Education, 20(2), 197–207. http://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2014.974026

Gianoutsos, D., & Winkelmes, M. A. (2016). Navigating with transparency. In Proceedings of the Pennsylvania Association of Developmental Educators.

Jones, E. (2008). Predicting performance in first-semester college basic writers: Revisiting the role of self-beliefs. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(2), 209–238. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.11.001

Pajares, F. (2003). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: A review of the literature. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 139–158. http://doi.org/10.1080/10573560390143085

Vollmer, A. (2016, November 16). “Adopting” a pathogen. Retrieved from http://schaechter.asmblog.org/schaechter/2016/09/adopting-a-pathogen.html

Vollmer, A. (2017). Your top 10 teaching headaches and how to turn them into learning opportunities. Seminar presented at the Caltech Project for Effective Teaching Winter Seminar Series, Pasadena, CA.

Winkelmes, M. A. (2017, January). Teaching with transparency: Empowering equitable learning. Seminar and Workshop presented at the Caltech TeachWeek, Pasadena, CA.

Winkelmes, M. A., Bernacki, M., Butler, J., Zochowski, M., Golanics, J., & Weavil, K. H. (2016). A teaching intervention that increases underserved college students success. Peer Review, 18(1/2). Retrieved from https://www.aacu.org/peerreview/2016/winterspring/Winkelmes




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31719/pjaw.v2i1.18

Copyright (c) 2018 Olivia H Wilkins, Camillus F Buzard

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.