Revising the Faculty Manual: The Client Project in Your Backyard

Article Sidebar

HTML PDF Lettner-Rust Assignment (PDF)
Published: Jun 20, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31719/pjaw.v2i2.25

Main Article Content

Heather Lettner-Rust
English Department, Longwood University

Abstract

This client project is a culminating assignment in an upper-level professional writing course designed to help students understand the nature of audience-based writing in an unfamiliar writing context. The specific task is for students to revise a substantial section of the university *Faculty Policies and Procedures Manual*. Students researched their audience, analyzed samples of university manuals at other higher education institutions, exercised document design strategies, and practiced syntax revision during the project, ultimately presenting a sample of their work to faculty for feedback. Employing design workshop strategies, this assignment requires students to interview faculty in order to understand multiple users' experiences of the university Faculty Policies and Procedures Manual. In addition, an essential component for student learning in this course is reflection. This reflection is centered on the rhetorical situation of using and revising genres (Devitt, 2009) in the context of a professional environment (Clark, 2005; Kain & Wardle, 2005) in order that students avoid perceiving the class as a march through memos, reports, and emails as static formats (Miller, 1984). This project engages students independently, as they are responsible for their own revisions of 30 pages, while class time is used collaboratively on learning new ways of viewing the document's potential and the genre's function.

Article Details

How to Cite
Lettner-Rust, H. (2018). Revising the Faculty Manual: The Client Project in Your Backyard. Prompt: A Journal of Academic Writing Assignments, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.31719/pjaw.v2i2.25
Issue
Vol. 2 No. 2 (2018)
Section
Articles

Prompt endorses the open-access publishing model which maximizes access to information. Authors retain copyright of their published work. Reuse of work published in Prompt must include clear attribution to the original text and be for non-commercial purposes, as specified by Creative Commons BY-NC.

References

Adler-Kassner, L., & Wardle, E. (2015). Naming what we know: Threshold concepts of writing studies. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.

Anson, C. (2016). The Pop Warner chronicles: A case study in contextual adaptation and the transfer of writing ability. College Composition and Communication, 67(4), 518–549.

Aristotle. (2006). On rhetoric: A theory of civic discourse. (G. A. Kennedy, Trans.) (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bartholomae, D. (1985). Inventing the university. In M. Rose (Ed.), When a writer can’t write: Studies in writer’s block and other composing-process problems. perspectives in writing research series (pp. 134–165). The Guilford Press.

Clark, I. (2005). A genre approach to writing assignments. Composition Forum, 14(2).

Devitt, A. (2009). Teaching critical genre awareness. In C. Bazerman, A. Bonini, & D. Figueiredo (Eds.), Genre in a changing world (pp. 337–351). West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press.

Devitt, A. J., Bawarshi, A., & Reiff, M. J. (2003). Materiality and genre in the study of discourse communities. College English, 65(5), 541–558.

Ede, L., & Lunsford, A. (1984). Audience addressed/audience invoked: The role of audience in composition theory and pedagogy. College Composition and Communication, 35(2), 155–171.

Miller, C. R. (1984). Genres as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70(2), 151–167.

Yancey, K., Robertson, L., & Taczak, K. (2014). Writing across contexts: Transfer, composition, and sites of writing (1 edition). Logan: Utah State University Press.