An Empirical Research Project in English and Writing Studies

Joyce Kinkead

Abstract


English majors generally are adept at literary criticism but tend to have less experience in conducting empirical research that draws on both qualitative and quantitative methods and engages human participants. To introduce those methods to students and to satisfy a university requirement for quantitative instruction applied to the discipline, I developed a course called Approaches to Research in English Studies. The students complete individual IRB-approved projects that result in a research report, a poster, and a lightning talk. Before undertaking the individual projects, the students engage in a whole-class research project that models the process, and this latter assignment is described here in this essay.

Full Text:

PDF HTML

References


American Council of Colleges and Universities. (2015). Signature work. https://www.aacu.org/sites/default/files/files/LEAP/LEAPChallengeSignatureWork.pdf.

Anderson, P., Charney, D., Cooper, M., Kirklighter, C., Mortensen, P., & Reynolds, M. (2001). Guidelines for the ethical treatment of students and student writing in composition studies. College Composition and Communication, 52(3), 485–90.

Behling, L. (2010). Reading, writing, & research: Undergraduate students as scholars in literary studies. Washington, DC: Council on Undergraduate Research.

Brown, R., Fallon, B., Lott, J., Matthews, E., & Mintie, E. (2007). Taking on Turnitin: Tutors advocating change. The Writing Center Journal, 27(1), 7–28.

Brunvand, J. H. (1986). The Mexican Pet: More "new" urban legends and some old favorites. Norton.

Cohen, P. (2010, December 3). Analyzing literature by words and numbers. New York Times, p. C1.

Conference on College on Composition and Communication. (2017). CCCC position statement on undergraduate research in writing: Principles and best practices. cccc.ncte.org/cccc/resources/positions/undergraduate-research.

Council on Undergraduate Research and National Conferences on Undergraduate Research. (2005). Joint statement of principles in support of undergraduate research, scholarship, and creative activities. http://www.cur.org/about_cur/history/joint_statement_of_cur_and_ncur/.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Dean, J. M., & Kaiser, M. L. (2010). Faculty-student collaborative research in the humanities. CUR Quarterly, 30(3), 43–47.

Dexter, J. P., Katz, T., Tripuraneni, N., Dasgupta, T., Kannan, A., Brofos, J. A., … Chaudhuri, P. (2017). Quantitative criticism of literary relationships. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(16), E3195–E3204. http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1611910114

Duersch, M., Blevins, D., Bennett, M., Bess, G., Bitner, J., Dotson, J., … Watson, N. (2018). The rise and fall of the blue book: An examination of essay exam books. Young Scholars in Writing, 15.

Fitzgerald, L. (2014a). Undergraduate research in writing studies. In I. Crawford, S. Orel, & J. Shanahan (Eds.), How to get started in arts and humanities research with undergraduates (pp. 94–106). Washington, DC: Council on Undergraduate Research.

Fitzgerald, L. (2014b). Undergraduate writing tutors as researchers: Redrawing boundaries. The Writing Center Journal, 33(2), 17–35.

Fitzgerald, W., & Midiri, N. (2013). But is it really research? Undergraduate anxieties in the humanities. PURM: Perspectives on Undergraduate Research Mentoring, 2(2), 1–13.

Gabbert, L. (2010). Exploring local communities: Conducting ethnographic research in folklore studies. CUR Quarterly, 30(4), 37–42.

Grant-Davie, K. (1992). Coding data: Issues of validity, reliability, and interpretation. In G. Kirsh & P. A. Sullivan (Eds.), Methods and methodology in composition research (pp. 270–286). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

Grobman, L. (2007). Affirming the independent researcher model: Undergraduate research in the humanities. CUR Quarterly, 28(1), 23–28.

Grobman, L. (2009). The Student scholar: (Re)Negotiating authorship and authority. College Composition and Communication, 61(1), 175–196.

Grobman, L., & Kinkead, J. (2010). Undergraduate research in English Studies. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

Haswell, R. H. (2005). NCTE/CCCC’s recent war on scholarship. Written Communication, 22(2), 198–223. http://doi.org/10.1177/0741088305275367

Hudson, P. (2013). Numbers and words: Quantitative methods for scholars of texts. In G. Griffin (Ed.), Research methods for English Studies (2nd ed., pp. 133–159). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Hurston, Z. (1942). Dust tracks on a road. J.B. Lippincott.

Janangelo, J. (2010). Anatomy of an article: How an undergraduate researcher turned a passionate project into a published essay. Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy, 16(1).

Kinkead, J. (2011). Undergraduate researchers as makers of knowledge in composition in the writing studies major. In R. Gebhardt & L. Massey (Eds.), The Changing of Knowledge in Composition (pp. 137–160). Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.

Kinkead, J. (2016). Researching writing: An introduction to research methods. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.

Kinkead, J. (2018). Engaging undergraduate researchers in the assessment of communication across the curriculum courses. Across the Disciplines, 15(2), 15–30.

Kinkead, J., & Grobman, L. (2011). Expanding opportunities for undergraduate research in english studies. Profession, 218–230. http://doi.org/10.1632/prof.2011.2011.1.218

Kinkead, J., & Moore, J. (2017). The Naylor Workshop in undergraduate research in writing studies. Literacy & NCTE. http://www2.ncte.org/blog/2017/09/naylor-workshop-undergraduate-research-writing-studies/.

Klos, N., Shanahan, J., & Young, G. (2011). Creative inquiry in the arts & humanities: Models of undergraduate research. Washington, DC: Council on Undergraduate Research.

Kuh, G. (2008). High-Impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.

McKee, H., & DeVoss, D. (Eds.). (2007). Digital writing research: Technologies, methodologies and ethical issues. New York: Hampton Press.

Moore, J. (2017). Review of researching writing: An introduction to research methods. Journal of Second Language Writing, 38, 1–3.

Pappas, C., & Tucker-Raymond, E. (2011). Becoming a teacher researcher in literacy teaching and learning: Strategies and tools for the inquiry process. New York: Routledge.

Perdue, S., Driscoll, D., Matthews, J., Paz, E., & Tess, J. (2014). Negotiating the sponsorship continuum: Preparing humanities undergraduates to conduct RAD research. PURM: Perspectives on Undergraduate Research and Mentoring, 3(2), 1–19.

Ray, R. (1993). The Practice of theory: Teacher research in composition. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Saldaña, J., & Omasta, M. (2018). Qualitative research: Analyzing life. SAGE Publications.

Scott, J., & Meloncon, L. (2017). Writing and rhetoric majors, disciplinarity, and techne. Composition Forum. https://compositionforum.com/issue/35/majors.php.

The Council on Undergraduate Research. (2017). Code of ethics for undergraduate research. https://www.cur.org/assets/1/7/Code_of_Ethics.pdf.

Traywick, D. (2010). Preaching what we practice: RCR instruction for undergraduate researchers in writing studies. In L. Grobman & J. Kinkead (Eds.), Undergraduate research in English studies (pp. 51–73).

Tufte, E. (2001). The visual display of quantitative information (2nd ed.). Graphics Press.

U.S. Department of Health & Human Services Office for Human Research Protections. (2018). Protection of human subjects, 46.102. Definitions for purposes of this policy. https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/retrieveECFR?gp=&SID=83cd09e1c0f5c6937cd9d7513160fc3f&pitd=20180719&n=pt45.1.46&r=PART&ty=HTML#se45.1.46_1102.

Wong, D. (2013). The Wall Street Journal guide to information graphics: The dos and don’ts of presenting data, facts, and figures. New York: Norton.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31719/pjaw.v3i2.40

Copyright (c) 2019 Joyce Kinkead

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.