The Policy Brief Assignment: Transferable Skills in Action in a Community-Engaged Writing Project

Main Article Content

Laurie Grobman


The policy brief assignment in my capstone course in professional writing was designed as a community-engaged project in partnership with a nonprofit organization whose mission is to grow Reading, Pennsylvania's economy. The assignment was intended to do real work in the world: the nonprofit's director, a city council member, and an outreach manager for the city of Reading plan to use the policy briefs to convince Reading's City Council to adopt the recommended policies to enhance citizen participation and representation in local governance and to address deficiencies identified through the STAR Community Rating System(r) (STAR), the nation's leading sustainability framework and certification program (STAR 2016). I welcomed the collaboration and designed the assignment with the goal that students would experience what writing faculty always tell them: fundamental concepts in composition and rhetoric/writing studies are operational in the workplace, and understanding writing and communication rhetorically opens up possibilities for them to enter diverse and unfamiliar writing contexts. Students successfully researched, synthesized, organized, and clearly communicated information in a content area and genre new to them. They presented their policy briefs in written and electronic form to the community partners and explained their work in oral presentations. It was an exciting, nerve-wracking, and challenging endeavor, and, as I will describe, the periods of dissonance led to the best learning experiences--for students and for me.

Article Details

How to Cite
Grobman, L. (2016). The Policy Brief Assignment: Transferable Skills in Action in a Community-Engaged Writing Project. Prompt: A Journal of Academic Writing Assignments, 1(1).


American Academy’s Commission on the Humanities and Social Sciences. (2013). The Heart of the Matter: The Humanities and Social Sciences for a Vibrant, Competitive, and Secure Nation. Cambridge, MA.

Bazerman, C. (1997). The life of genre, the life in the classroom. In W. Bishop and H. Ostrom (Eds.) Genre and Writing: Issues, Arguments, Alternatives (pp. 19-26). Boynton/Cook.

Blythe, S., Lauer, C., & Curran, P. G. (2014). Professional and Technical Communication in a Web 2.0 World. Technical Communication Quarterly, 23(4), 265–287.

Brumberger, E., & Lauer, C. (2015). The Evolution of Technical Communication: An Analysis of Industry Job Postings. Technical Communication, 62(4), 224–243.

Cella, L. J. (2013). Introduction: Taking Stock of Our Past and Assessing the Future of Community Writing Work. In Restaino & L. J. Cella (Eds.), Unsustainable: Re-imagining Community Literacy, Public Writing, Service-Learning, and the University (pp. 1–14). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

Communities, S. (2016). STAR Communities.

Conference on College on Composition and Communication. (2016). CCCC Statement on Community-Engaged Projects in Rhetoric and Composition.

Doerr, E. (2011). Cognitive dissonance in international service-learning. In B. Porfilio & H. Hickman (Eds.), Critical service-learning as revolutionary pedagogy: A project of student agency in action (pp. 71–94). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

Hart Research Associates on Behalf of the Association of American. (2015). Falling Short? College Learning and Career Success. Association of American Colleges & Universities. Text,

Humphreys, D., & Kelly, P. (2014). How liberal arts and sciences majors fare in employment: A report on earnings and long-term career paths. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.

Kellogg Commission on the Future of State and Land-Grant Universities. (1999). Returning to our roots: The engaged institution (Vol. 3). Washington, DC: National Association of State Universities and Land-Grant Colleges, Office of Public Affairs.

Kiely, R. (2005). A transformative learning model for service-learning: A longitudinal case study. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 12(1), 5–22.