Main Article Content
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Prompt endorses the open-access publishing model which maximizes access to information. Authors retain copyright of their published work. Reuse of work published in Prompt must include clear attribution to the original text and be for non-commercial purposes, as specified by Creative Commons BY-NC.
Fahnestock, J., & Secor, M. (1991). The rhetoric of literary criticism. In C. Bazerman & J. Paradis (Eds.), Textual dynamics of the professions: Historical and contemporary studies of writing in professional communities (pp. 76–96). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
Graff, G. (2003). Clueless in academe: How schooling obscures the life of the mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Guinn, D. M. (1979). Composing an abstract: A practical heuristic. College Composition and Communication, 30(4), 380–383.
Harris, J. (2017). Rewriting: How to do things with texts (2nd ed.). Boulder, CO: Utah State University Press.
Howard, R. M., Serviss, T., & Rodrigue, T. K. (2010). Writing from sources, writing from sentences. Writing and Pedagogy, 2(2), 177–192.
Lewin, B. A., Fine, J., & Young, L. (2001). Expository discourse: A genre-based approach to social science research texts. New York, NY: Continuum.
Melander, B., Swales, J. M., & Fredrickson, K. M. (1997). Journal abstracts from three academic fields in the United States and Sweden: National or disciplinary proclivities? In A. Duszak (Ed.), Culture and styles of academic discourse (pp. 251–272). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Silver, M. S., & Bondi, M. (2004). Weaving voices: A study of article openings in historical discourse. In G. Del Lungo Camiciotti & E. Tognini Bonelli (Eds.), Academic discourse: New insights into evaluation (pp. 141–159). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Stotesbury, H. (2003). Evaluation in research article abstracts in the narrative and hard sciences. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2(4), 327–341.
Stotesbury, H. (2006). Gaps and false conclusions: Criticism in research article abstracts across the disciplines. In K. Hyland & M. Bondi (Eds.), Academic discourse across disciplines (pp. 123–148). Bern: Peter Lang.
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres: Exploration and applications. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2000). English in today’s research world: A writing guide. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2009). Abstracts and the writing of abstracts. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Troutman, P. (2010). The discourse of comics scholarship: A rhetorical analysis of research article introductions. International Journal of Comic Art, 12(2/3), 432–444.
Williams, J. M., & Bizup, J. (2014). Style: The basics of clarity and grace (5th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson.